By Editor | Published: October 25, 2011
2011-09-12, Phnom Penh, Cambodia. After reviewing the WWII jurisprudence cited by the ICTY and the STL in support of JCE III, the ECCC Trial Chamber found that the inference drawn by those tribunals that post-WWII convictions were based on JCE III “was not the only possible one based on the surviving record.” As a result, the [...]
Posted in ECCC | Also tagged 002/19-09-2007/ECCC/TC, Andrew Cayley, Ang Udom, applicability, Borkum Island Case, Chea Leang, common criminal plan, Control Council Law No. 10, customary international law, Diana ELLIS, Duch Judgement, Elisabeth SIMONNEAU FORT, Essen Lynching Case, extended form, form of responsibility, general principle of law, genocidal intent, genocide, ICTY Appeals Chamber, Ieng Sary, Ieng Thirith, Jaques VERGES, JCE I, JCE II, JCE III, Jean-Marc Lavergne, joint criminal enterprise, jurisdictional challenge, Khieu Samphan, Krnojetac, Kvocka, Michael G. Karnavas, Michiel PESTMAN, Munyakazi, Nil Nonn, non-criminal common plan, Nuon Chea, participation, Phat Pouv Seang, PICH Ang, preliminary objections, Prosecutor v. Tadic, re-characterization, Rule 89, Sa Sovan, SCSL, Silvia Cartwright, Simba, SON Arun, specific intent, Thou Mony, Ulrich and Merkle, Victor KOPPE, Wuelfert, Ya Sokhan
ECCC: 002: Trial Chamber Rejects JCEIII