By Editor | Published: April 29, 2010
2010-04-07, Arusha, Tanzania. The Trial Chamber III granted, in part, Nzirorera’s motion for reconsideration of the Chamber’s decisions on the admission of written statements, but denied Nzirorera’s defence counsel fees on the ground that there was no good cause for this Motion. Statement of Law. The Chamber has the inherent power to reconsider its decisions when: [...]
Posted in ICTR | Also tagged acts and conduct of the accused, admission, Chantal Hounkpatin, Cyprien Ntakabereho, definitive proof, Dennis C. M. Byron, Dior Diagne Mbaye, discretion, Don Webster, Edison Munyatarama, Edouard Karemera, fair trial, Félix Sow, Frederic Weyl, Gberdao Gustave Kam, indictment, Jean-Baptiste Nsanzimfura, Joseph Nzirorera, live and important issue, Matthieu Ngirumpatse, Patrick Nimy Mayidika Ngimbi, peripheral issue, Peter Robinson, prima facie credibility, prima facie reliability, probative value, reconsideration, relevant, Rule 73, Rule 89 (C), Rule 92 bis, Rule 92 bis (A), Rule 92 bis (A) (i), Rule 92 bis (A) (ii), Rule 92 bis (B), Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Saidou N’Dow, sufficient indicia, Sunkarie Ballah-Conteh, Takeh Sendze, Vagn Joensen, written statements
ICTR: Karemera: TC Reconsiders Admissibility of Statements, But Finds ‘No Good Cause’ for the Motion