Tag Archives: exculpatory evidence

ICC: Lubanga: OTP Shall Disclose Information Re Defence Witnesses

2010-11-12, The Hague, The Netherlands. In its Decision on the Scope of the Prosecution’s Disclosure Obligations as regards Defence Witnesses, the Trial Chamber held that the prosecution’s disclosure obligations under Rule 11 are wide, and they encompass, inter alia, any item that is relevant to the preparation of the defence, and include not only material [...]
Posted in ICC | Also tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments closed

ECCC: Ieng: Request for Annulment of All Investigations Denied

2010-06-25, Phnom Penh, Cambodia. The Pre-Trial Chamber (PTC) granted the defence’s appeal of the Co-Investigative Judges’ (CIJ) order rejecting the defence’s request for annulment of all investigations. However, the PTC dismissed the request for annulment, after reconsidering it on its merits. Procedural History On December 7, 2009, the defence filed a request to annul all investigations [...]
Posted in ECCC | Also tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments closed

ICC: OTP Intermediaries to Be Disclosed to the Defence

2010-06-02, The Hague, The Netherlands. Judges ordered the OTP to provide the Defence with the details of the professional background of intermediaries. The Chamber rejected the OTP’s suggestion to examine the intermediaries in the absence of both parties, and to hear evidence about selection of intermediaries from the “appropriate representative”. The Chamber found that both [...]
Posted in ICC | Also tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments closed
Get Adobe Flash player