Tag Archives: Ivan Cermak

ICTY: Gotovina: Leave to Appeal the Reopening of the Trial Granted

2010-05-10, The Hague, The Netherlands. Judge Orie certified the Cermak and Markac Defence appeal of the Chamber’s confidential decision to reopen the OTP’s case in order to present new evidence. Statement of Law and Application (Rule 73 (B)). 1. the decision involved an issue that would significantly affect the fair and expeditious conduct of the proceedings or [...]
Posted in ICTY | Also tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments closed

ICTY: Gotovina: Appeals Chamber Takes Word-Limits Seriously

2010-05-13, The Hague, The Netherlands. Judge Fausto Pocar of the Appeals Chamber granted, in part, Gotovina’s motion to strike the OTP’s Prosecution’s Response to Gotovina Defence Appeal Concerning Permanent Restraining Orders to the Republic of Croatia. The Appeals Chamber forced the OTP to refile their Response because the OTP inserted quotes from Gotovina’s arguments at [...]
Posted in ICTY | Also tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments closed

Croatia: Gotovina: Defence Files Criminal Complaint Against UN Observers

2010-04-26, Zagreb, Croatia. Luka Misetic, Ante Gotovina’s defence counsel, submitted a criminal complaint against former UNMO (United Nations Military Observers) staffers: Alexander Tchernetsky (Russia) , Viktor Tarusin (Russia; Chief Information Officer), and Peter Gage Williams (Britain; Colonel). The complaint alleges that Mr. Tchernetsky found military documents of Croatian Army related to the Operation Storm, a.k.a. [...]
Posted in BiH WCS, ICTY | Also tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments closed

ICTY: Gotovina: Guidance on the Admissibility of Unattested Rule 92 ter Statements as Previous Inconsistent Statements

2010-03-30, The Hague, The Netherlands. The Guidance deals with the admission of those parts of Rule 92 ter statements that witnesses fail to attest to in the course of their in-court testimony, and that, as a result, constitute previous inconsistent statements. Previous inconsistent statement may be admitted into evidence for the following two purposes (TC [...]
Posted in ICTY | Also tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments closed
Get Adobe Flash player