Archives
Categories
Tags
admission Alan Tieger Andrew Cayley appeal application Argentina arrest Baltasar Garzon BiH charges crimes against humanity Croatia disclosure Ejup Ganic extradition fair trial Fatou Bensouda Fausto Pocar France genocide ICC indictment International Criminal Court international criminal procedure Investigation JNA jurisdiction Kenya Luis Moreno-Ocampo motion murder probative value Radovan Karadzic rape Richard Harvey Rome Statute Rules of Procedure and Evidence Rwanda Sarajevo Serbia Srebrenica torture United States universal jurisdiction war crimes
Tag Archives: judgment
USA: Samantar v. Yousuf: USSC Votes for Accountability
2010-06-01, Washington D.C., U.S.A. The USSC rendered its judgment in Samantar v. Yousuf - a case filed by the CJA on behalf of victims of violations of human rights against a former Somali Minister of Defense and Prime Minister Mohamed Ali Samantar. The claim was brought under the Torture Victim Protection Act of 1991 and the Alien Tort Statute. [...]
Posted in Domestic Courts Also tagged agency or instrumentality, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Alexandria, Alien Tort Statute, Allyson K. Duncan, Amy Howe, Andrea C. Evans, ATS, Bashe Abid Yousuf, Beth Stephens, Center for Justice and Accountability, CJA, Cooley Godward Kronish LLP, corporate entity, David J. Strandness, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, FSIA, head-of-state immunity, Howe & Russell, human rights, immunity, individual officials, Jeffrey L. Fisher, Jones Day, Jr., Julian H. Spirer and Fred B. Goldberg, Kevin K. Russell, Kyle C. Wong, L. Kathleen Roberts, lack of subject matter jurisdiction, Lauren Kerwin, Leonie M. Brinkema, Lori R. E. Ploeger, Mark J. MacDougall, Maureen P. Alger, Michael A. Carvin, Minister of Defense, Mohamed Ali Samantar, Natasha E. Fain, official capacity, Pamela M. Merchant, Pamela S. Karlan, Patricia A. Millett, Patricia Millet, Paul V. Lettow, political body, Prime Minister, Robert B. King, Robert R. Vieth, Rule 12(b)(1), Samantar v. Yousuf, SCOTUS, Shay Dvoretzky, Somalia, Spirer & Goldberg, Standlord Law School, state sovereign immunity, Steven Schulman, Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, Thomas C. Goldstein, torture, Torture Victim Protection Act, Torture Victim Protection Act of 1991, TVPA, United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, United States Supreme Court, USSC, William B. Traxler Comments closed
ECCC: Duch: Trial Judgment to be Rendered on July 26
2010-05-24, Phnom Penh, Cambodia. The trial judgment in the Duch case will be announced on July 26. Mr. Kaing was accused of committing crimes against humanity, war crimes, premeditated murder and torture as a head of the prison camp S21. The accused was arrested on 30 July 2007, and tried between 30 March and 27 November [...]
Posted in ECCC Also tagged 001/18-07-2007-ECCC/TC, 1956 Cambodian Penal Code, Communist Party of Kampuchea, CPK, crimes against humanity, Duch, head, Kaing Guek Eav, Office S21, premeditated murder, prison, S21, Santebal, torture, trial judgment, war crimes Comments closed
ICJ: Pulp Mills: Uruguay Breached Procedural, but not Substantive Obligations
2010-04-20, The Hague, The Netherlands. The Court rendered its judgment in Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay). The Court found that claims arising from noise, visual pollution, and bad odours produced by the Orion (Botnia) mill did not fall within its jurisdiction because they did not relate to the interpretation or application; [...]
Posted in ICJ Also tagged 1961 Treaty of Montevideo, 1975 Statute of the River Uruguay, Abraham, Administrative Commission of the River Uruguay, Al-Khasawneh, Bennouna, Botnia, Cancado Trindade, CARU, CMB, Couvreur., ENCE, General List No. 135, Greenwood, Keith, Koroma, Orion, Port terminal at Nueva Palmira, pulp mill, Sepulveda-Amor, Simma, Skotnikov, summary, Tomka, Torres Bernardez, Vinuesa, Yusuf Comments closed
ICJ: Pulp Mills: The Judgment to be Rendered in April
2010-03-26, The Hague, The Netherlands. The ICJ to render the judgment in the case of Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay) on April 20, 2010. The conflict between the two states is in respect of the Botnia pulp mill that Argentina alleged pollutes air and water. The mill, that is worth $1.2B , is Uruguay’s largest [...]
ICTR: Hategekimana: Trial Chamber Sentences the Accused to Life Imprisonment