Archives
Categories
Tags
admission Alan Tieger Andrew Cayley appeal application Argentina arrest Baltasar Garzon BiH charges crimes against humanity Croatia disclosure Ejup Ganic extradition fair trial Fatou Bensouda Fausto Pocar France genocide ICC indictment International Criminal Court international criminal procedure Investigation JNA jurisdiction Kenya Luis Moreno-Ocampo motion murder probative value Radovan Karadzic rape Richard Harvey Rome Statute Rules of Procedure and Evidence Rwanda Sarajevo Serbia Srebrenica torture United States universal jurisdiction war crimes
Tag Archives: Novak Lukic
ICTY: Perisic: TC Admits Evidence of Babic, Deronjic & Dukic under Rule 92 Quater
2010-04-21, The Hague, The Netherlands. The Trial Chamber granted the defence’s motion to admit evidence of Milan Babic, Miroslav Deronjic and Dorde Dukic under Rule 92 quater. Statement of Law. In order to admit evidence under Rule 92 quater, the Chamber should be satisfied that the person is unavailable; the evidence which is sought to [...]
Posted in ICTY Also tagged Bakone Justice Moloto, credibility, cross-examination, cumulative relevance, Daniel Saxon, Dorde Dukic, evidence, Gregor Guy-Smith, indictment, interpreter, issue of central importance, IT-04-81-T, manifest or obvious inconsistencies, Mark Harmon, Michele Picard, Milan Babic, Miroslav Deronjic, motion, oath, Pedro David, probative value, purpose for admission, relevance, reliable, Rule 89 (C), Rule 92 quater, Rules of Procedure and Evidence, temporal scope, trial record, unavailable, unsworn statement Comments closed
ICTY: Sljivancanin: Review Hearing Scheduled for June 3
2010-04-20, The Hague, The Netherlands. The Appeals Chamber, by majority, made a decision to hear a testimony of Miodrag Panic. The Defence argues that his testimony will invalidate Sljivancanin’s conviction for aiding and abetting murder as a war crime. The issue of whether the evidentiary hearing itself is justified (on the ground that the testimony [...]
Posted in ICTY Also tagged aiding and abetting, Andresia Vaz, evidentiary hearing, Fausto Pocar, finality of judgments, flood gate concern, IT-95-13/1-R.1, Liu Daqun, Mehmet Guney, murder, new fact, Peter Kremer, reconsideration, review, Rule 107, Rule 119, Rule 54, Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Stephane Bourgon, Theodor Meron, Veselin Sljivancanin Comments closed
ICTY: Submissions of Parties May Constitute Adjudicated Facts