Archives
Categories
Tags
admission Alan Tieger Andrew Cayley appeal application Argentina arrest Baltasar Garzon BiH charges crimes against humanity Croatia disclosure Ejup Ganic extradition fair trial Fatou Bensouda Fausto Pocar France genocide ICC indictment International Criminal Court international criminal procedure Investigation JNA jurisdiction Kenya Luis Moreno-Ocampo motion murder probative value Radovan Karadzic rape Richard Harvey Rome Statute Rules of Procedure and Evidence Rwanda Sarajevo Serbia Srebrenica torture United States universal jurisdiction war crimes
Tag Archives: reconsideration
ICTR: Karemera: TC Reconsiders Admissibility of Statements, But Finds ‘No Good Cause’ for the Motion
2010-04-07, Arusha, Tanzania. The Trial Chamber III granted, in part, Nzirorera’s motion for reconsideration of the Chamber’s decisions on the admission of written statements, but denied Nzirorera’s defence counsel fees on the ground that there was no good cause for this Motion. Statement of Law. The Chamber has the inherent power to reconsider its decisions when: [...]
Posted in ICTR Also tagged acts and conduct of the accused, admission, Chantal Hounkpatin, Charles Nzabagerageza, Cyprien Ntakabereho, definitive proof, Dennis C. M. Byron, Dior Diagne Mbaye, discretion, Don Webster, Edison Munyatarama, Edouard Karemera, fair trial, Félix Sow, Frederic Weyl, Gberdao Gustave Kam, indictment, Jean-Baptiste Nsanzimfura, Joseph Nzirorera, live and important issue, Matthieu Ngirumpatse, Patrick Nimy Mayidika Ngimbi, peripheral issue, Peter Robinson, prima facie credibility, prima facie reliability, probative value, relevant, Rule 73, Rule 89 (C), Rule 92 bis, Rule 92 bis (A), Rule 92 bis (A) (i), Rule 92 bis (A) (ii), Rule 92 bis (B), Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Saidou N’Dow, sufficient indicia, Sunkarie Ballah-Conteh, Takeh Sendze, Vagn Joensen, written statements Comments closed
ICTY: Sljivancanin: Review Hearing Scheduled for June 3
2010-04-20, The Hague, The Netherlands. The Appeals Chamber, by majority, made a decision to hear a testimony of Miodrag Panic. The Defence argues that his testimony will invalidate Sljivancanin’s conviction for aiding and abetting murder as a war crime. The issue of whether the evidentiary hearing itself is justified (on the ground that the testimony [...]
Posted in ICTY Also tagged aiding and abetting, Andresia Vaz, evidentiary hearing, Fausto Pocar, finality of judgments, flood gate concern, IT-95-13/1-R.1, Liu Daqun, Mehmet Guney, murder, new fact, Novak Lukic, Peter Kremer, review, Rule 107, Rule 119, Rule 54, Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Stephane Bourgon, Theodor Meron, Veselin Sljivancanin Comments closed
ICTY: Karadzic: TC Reiterates Its Refusal to Hear Deronjic’s Evidence