Archives
Categories
Tags
admission Alan Tieger Andrew Cayley appeal application Argentina arrest Baltasar Garzon BiH charges crimes against humanity Croatia disclosure Ejup Ganic extradition fair trial Fatou Bensouda Fausto Pocar France genocide ICC indictment International Criminal Court international criminal procedure Investigation JNA jurisdiction Kenya Luis Moreno-Ocampo motion murder probative value Radovan Karadzic rape Richard Harvey Rome Statute Rules of Procedure and Evidence Rwanda Sarajevo Serbia Srebrenica torture United States universal jurisdiction war crimes
Tag Archives: Rule 73
ICTR: Ngirabatware: Defence Motion re Materials to be Obtained from Belgium Denied
2010-05-28, Arusha, Tanzania. The Trial Chamber denied the defence motion to obtain certain materials in respect of the Witness ANAV from the Belgian authorities. The Trial Chamber stated that in order to be successful on a motion for an Article 28 order for State cooperation, the party should (i) specifically identify, to the extent possible, [...]
Posted in ICTR Also tagged Anav, Anne-Gaelle Denier, Article 28, Article 28 (2), Augustin Ngirabatware, Belgium, Chloe Gaden-Gistucci, Deogratias Sebureze, Faria Rekkas, ICTR-99-54-T, Iskander Ismail, motion, Mparany Rajohnson, Mylene Dimitri, Patrick Gabaake, Peter Herbert, Rules, Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Solomy Balungi Bossa, Statute, Statute of the Tribunal, Wallace Kapaya, William H. Sekule, witness Comments closed
ICTR: Karemera: TC Reconsiders Admissibility of Statements, But Finds ‘No Good Cause’ for the Motion
2010-04-07, Arusha, Tanzania. The Trial Chamber III granted, in part, Nzirorera’s motion for reconsideration of the Chamber’s decisions on the admission of written statements, but denied Nzirorera’s defence counsel fees on the ground that there was no good cause for this Motion. Statement of Law. The Chamber has the inherent power to reconsider its decisions when: [...]
Posted in ICTR Also tagged acts and conduct of the accused, admission, Chantal Hounkpatin, Charles Nzabagerageza, Cyprien Ntakabereho, definitive proof, Dennis C. M. Byron, Dior Diagne Mbaye, discretion, Don Webster, Edison Munyatarama, Edouard Karemera, fair trial, Félix Sow, Frederic Weyl, Gberdao Gustave Kam, indictment, Jean-Baptiste Nsanzimfura, Joseph Nzirorera, live and important issue, Matthieu Ngirumpatse, Patrick Nimy Mayidika Ngimbi, peripheral issue, Peter Robinson, prima facie credibility, prima facie reliability, probative value, reconsideration, relevant, Rule 89 (C), Rule 92 bis, Rule 92 bis (A), Rule 92 bis (A) (i), Rule 92 bis (A) (ii), Rule 92 bis (B), Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Saidou N’Dow, sufficient indicia, Sunkarie Ballah-Conteh, Takeh Sendze, Vagn Joensen, written statements Comments closed
ICTY: Prlic: Appellate Judges Assigned
2010-04-13, The Hague, The Netherlands. The President of the Tribunal assigned the following judges to hear the appeal in Prlic: Judge Mehmet Guney Judge Fausto Pocar Judge Andresia Vaz Judge Theodor Meron Judge Carmel Agius Decision
Posted in ICTY Also tagged Andresia Vaz, Article 12(3), Article 14(3), Carmel Agius, Fausto Pocar, IT-04-74-AR73.17, Mehmet Guney, Patrick Robinson, Rule 92 bis, Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Theodor Meron Comments closed
ICTY: Karadzic: Motion To Obtain Witness Statements From National Courts Denied