Archives
Categories
Tags
admission Alan Tieger Andrew Cayley appeal application Argentina arrest Baltasar Garzon BiH charges crimes against humanity Croatia disclosure Ejup Ganic extradition fair trial Fatou Bensouda Fausto Pocar France genocide ICC indictment International Criminal Court international criminal procedure Investigation JNA jurisdiction Kenya Luis Moreno-Ocampo motion murder probative value Radovan Karadzic rape Richard Harvey Rome Statute Rules of Procedure and Evidence Rwanda Sarajevo Serbia Srebrenica torture United States universal jurisdiction war crimes
Tag Archives: Steven Kay
ICTY: Gotovina: Guidance on the Admissibility of Unattested Rule 92 ter Statements as Previous Inconsistent Statements
2010-03-30, The Hague, The Netherlands. The Guidance deals with the admission of those parts of Rule 92 ter statements that witnesses fail to attest to in the course of their in-court testimony, and that, as a result, constitute previous inconsistent statements. Previous inconsistent statement may be admitted into evidence for the following two purposes (TC [...]
Posted in ICTY Also tagged admission, Alan Tieger, Alphons Orie, Andrew Cayley, Ante Gotovina, Elizabeth Gwaunza, Gillian Higgins, Goran Mikulicic, Gregory Kehoe, IT-06-90-T, Ivan Cermak, leges specialis, lex generalis, Luka MiSetid, Mladen Markac, Payam Akhavan, previous inconsistent statement, prior inconsistent statement, Rule 89(C), Rule 92 bis, Rule 92 quater, Rule 92 ter, statement, Stefan Waespi, Tomislav Kuzmanovic, Uldis Kinis Comments closed
ICTY: Gotovina: Leave to Appeal the Reopening of the Trial Granted